Developmental Evaluation for beginners
It is “Juneuary” on the west coast of British Columbia, a time of year when low-pressure systems of cold air break off the jet stream and drift down the coast providing unstable weather, rain, and cloudy days. It’s like a return to winter.
It reminds me that walking in the mountains in the winter, or indeed during these wet and unpredictable weeks, can result in getting lost in fog. When that happens, your response to the situation becomes very important if you are to make choices that don’t endanger lives.
My colleague Ciaran Camman was presenting on a webinar with a client today and used a lovely metaphor to describe developmental evaluation relating to being lost in a fog. I’m always looking at ways of describing this approach to evaluation with people because it is so different from the kinds of evaluation we are used to, where someone external to a process judges you on how well you did what you said you were going to do. Having said that, I like to introduce people to “developmental evaluation” by telling them it is actually just a fancy way of talking about what people do to make everyday decisions in changing and unfamiliar contexts. In some ways, you could call it “natural evaluation.”
Ciaran used the example of navigating in a fog. When the cloud descends on you, you best slow down for a minute and think about your next step. You have a sense of your destination – a nice warm house and a cup of tea – but suddenly what you thought you knew about the world has disappeared.
You can manage for a short time based on the last picture you had of your surroundings, but after a few meters of walking, you will be in a very different place, and you need to carefully probe your way forward. As you find the path again, you can move with a bit more confidence, as as the trail fades, you will adjust and slow down to sense more carefully.
Developmental evaluation is indistinguishable from adaptive action. The two sets of processes form an interdependent pair: you simply can’t do one without the other. How you choose to developmentally evaluate – including what you consider to be important, your axiology – is critical to how you will gather information and what decision you will take to adjust your action. Walking in fog towards a warm cup of tea is fairly straightforward. Creating new forms of community safety in a world dominated by racism and social and economic injustice is rather more difficult.
How do you explain this to folks?
When you are lost
Chris: Early this year a colleague in Safety introduced me to Michael Quinn Patton’s 2012 book. Found chapter 4 re Cynefin Framework interesting.
Speaking of creating new forms of safety, we’re using the Scaffolding concept to shape the Next Normal. When there is a fair bit of certainty (i.e., minimal fog) you can use a robust scaffold since you kinda know what the final building will be. However, when you don’t know the final product will be, what type of scaffolding should one use?
Our thought is to use Learning as a scaffold. We take one step at a time, see how firm the ground is, and learn something new. The next step builds off that solid step. We may discover that we need to back off by unlearning and relearn to head in an oblique direction.
Hi Chris. I use driving a car in mist and fog metaphor as a generally good rule of thumb for looking at or being in complex systems. We need to slow down ASAP for even if you think you know the route well, you can not predict how others will react to the new circumstance and thus alter the conditions.