<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Holding questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?p=2195</link>
	<description>Alive in the process arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Ziegler</title>
		<link>http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?p=2195&#038;cpage=1#comment-552778</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Ziegler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?p=2195#comment-552778</guid>
		<description>Chris....Excellent question/article.  I’m growing more and more fond of the idea that the question is at least as (if not more) important than the answer!  As a mediator / online collaboration consultant, and I think connected to your question re: &quot;relational fields...&quot;,  here’s a couple of questions that I seem to be holding up these days:
1. What’s the ‘most important thing’ I&#039;m trying to say on this issue/topic?
2. How might going with this &#039;x&#039; approach strengthen the relationship?
cheers, Ben</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris&#8230;.Excellent question/article.  I’m growing more and more fond of the idea that the question is at least as (if not more) important than the answer!  As a mediator / online collaboration consultant, and I think connected to your question re: &#8220;relational fields&#8230;&#8221;,  here’s a couple of questions that I seem to be holding up these days:<br />
1. What’s the ‘most important thing’ I&#8217;m trying to say on this issue/topic?<br />
2. How might going with this &#8216;x&#8217; approach strengthen the relationship?<br />
cheers, Ben</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Ovenell-Carter</title>
		<link>http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?p=2195&#038;cpage=1#comment-552777</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Ovenell-Carter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot/?p=2195#comment-552777</guid>
		<description>It seems there is method in my madness. I&#039;ve been doing this rather unconsciously the last couple months as I&#039;ve been working to make sense of the way emerging technologies affect education and--as you have--to make something out of open government on Bowen. At least in terms of these big picture things the process has been much more rewarding than my old habit of setting goals--invariably I had to revise things once I reached them because to reach the goal I had assumed certain conditions which were not always there. I&#039;ll keep my questions up front from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems there is method in my madness. I&#8217;ve been doing this rather unconsciously the last couple months as I&#8217;ve been working to make sense of the way emerging technologies affect education and&#8211;as you have&#8211;to make something out of open government on Bowen. At least in terms of these big picture things the process has been much more rewarding than my old habit of setting goals&#8211;invariably I had to revise things once I reached them because to reach the goal I had assumed certain conditions which were not always there. I&#8217;ll keep my questions up front from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
